Medium Image
607
paged,wp-singular,page-template,page-template-blog-small-image,page-template-blog-small-image-php,page,page-id-607,page-child,parent-pageid-1815,paged-144,page-paged-144,wp-theme-bridge,wp-child-theme-WACC-bridge,bridge-core-3.3.4.8,qodef-qi--no-touch,qi-addons-for-elementor-1.11,qode-page-transition-enabled,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-title-hidden,qode-smooth-scroll-enabled,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-30.8.9.1,qode-theme-bridge,qode_header_in_grid,qode-wpml-enabled,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-9.0.1,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-41156

Last year the South African president elevated the epidemic of violence against women to national crisis level following pressure from activists, promising to put in place a public national register of offenders, a review of cold cases and harsher penalties for perpetrators.

No apologies for quoting at length from “The Media Isn’t Ready to Cover Climate Apartheid” by Michelle García (The Nation, 17 June 2020). While praising the public service ethic of many media outlets, whose coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic has been exemplary, she notes an apparent reticence or inability to delve in depth into its impact on the most marginalized. She also questions media preparedness for the greater crisis to follow: