Medium Image
607
paged,wp-singular,page-template,page-template-blog-small-image,page-template-blog-small-image-php,page,page-id-607,page-child,parent-pageid-1815,paged-147,page-paged-147,wp-theme-bridge,wp-child-theme-WACC-bridge,bridge-core-3.3.4.8,qodef-qi--no-touch,qi-addons-for-elementor-1.11,qode-page-transition-enabled,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-title-hidden,qode-smooth-scroll-enabled,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-30.8.9.1,qode-theme-bridge,qode_header_in_grid,qode-wpml-enabled,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-9.0.1,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-41156

There is nothing new about hate speech. What has changed is the mode of delivery. In Nazi Germany, it was state-controlled newspapers and radio. At the time of the genocide in Rwanda, it was a radio station run by the Hutu government. Today, it is social media, until recently largely unregulated.

Last year the South African president elevated the epidemic of violence against women to national crisis level following pressure from activists, promising to put in place a public national register of offenders, a review of cold cases and harsher penalties for perpetrators.